Controversies in Psychiatric History: The Dark Chapters

Photo by Jon Butterworth on Unsplash

Learning How Psychiatry Began and Controversies in Psychiatric History

Over the decades, psychiatry—the area of medicine that focuses on mental health—has advanced significantly.  Compassion, evidence-based treatment, and patient rights are frequently emphasized in contemporary psychiatric care.  But there are also troubling and contentious periods in its history, including alleged treatments and torture procedures. 

These controversies in psychiatric history and past errors have a profound impact on the lives of innumerable people, in addition to influencing how the general public views mental illness.  In order to learn from the past and keep constructing a more compassionate mental healthcare system, it is imperative that we comprehend these disputes.

The Beginnings of Psychiatry

Historically, alienists (those who dealt with alienated patients and later termed psychiatrists) were responsible for the establishment of state hospitals in the early nineteenth century, the majority of which were situated in rural places far from the medical mainstream.  Staff members in these facilities played the role of a “compassionate caretaker rather than a true doctor.” The therapies they used, such as purges, cold packs, and restraints, furthered the division between psychiatry and medicine. Mental hospitals evolved into merely detention centers that treated individuals with no chance of recovery.

Psychoanalytic and psychodynamic psychiatrists dominated the field after 1945 and for the next thirty years. They trained newcomers to the field and oversaw the majority of medical school psychiatry departments. In this period where there were many controversies in psychiatric history, psychiatrists became “a plague upon American medicine” because of their “dogmatic and faith-based approach” to psychoanalysis and their animosity toward Freud’s research and experiments.

As a result, psychiatry began to focus more on the worried well than on patients with severe mental illnesses.  Despite the fact that none of its diagnostic categories were supported by empirical research or scientific evidence, the 1952 release of the American Psychological Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (also known as DSM-I) marked the triumph of psychoanalytic and psychodynamic psychiatry as new beginnings of psychiatry emerged.

The Greatest Controversies in Psychiatric History

Photo by Marco Bianchetti on Unsplash

Inhumane Conditions and Asylums

The usage of psychiatric asylums, which started in earnest in the 18th and 19th centuries, is one of the oldest and most persistent conflicts.  Even though some were established with the best of intentions, many soon turned into abuse and neglect hotspots.  Inhumane treatment practices, inadequate sanitation, overcrowding, and a shortage of skilled personnel were commonplace. 

Regardless matter whether their diseases improved, patients were frequently confined for life.  The notorious Bedlam Hospital in London, where guests could pay to observe patients as a kind of public entertainment, came to represent the brutality of this institution.

Many persons with mental diseases were misdiagnosed or committed without a good reason, and the institutionalization of these individuals effectively alienated them from society.  Public exposés and a heightened understanding of human rights did not accelerate deinstitutionalization efforts until the middle of the 20th century and took years of evolution into the asylums they are today.

Misuse of Social Control Diagnoses

The abuse of mental health diagnoses for social or political control is the subject of another concerning chapter of controversies in psychiatric history.  For instance, the Soviet leadership used psychiatry as a weapon to quell resistance.

Man In Uncomfortable Position On The Floor l Photo by Behrooz on Unsplash

A common diagnosis for political opponents was “sluggish schizophrenia,” an ill-defined and unproven illness that warranted their detention in mental institutes.  These people were punished for their ideas, although they were not clinically mentally ill.

This misuse of psychiatry exposed the perils of unbridled authority inside the mental health system and caused long-lasting scars on its credibility in some areas.

Similar to this, there have been cases in the US where underprivileged groups—especially women and people of color—have been disproportionately labeled with mental illnesses.  In the 19th and early 20th centuries, terms like “hysteria” were frequently employed to minimize women’s feelings or resistance.  Stigmas that still exist today are a result of this pathologizing of everyday behavior.

The Lobotomies Tragedy

The lobotomy is one of the most contentious mental health procedures.  The technique, which was first used in the 1930s, entailed cutting off connections in the frontal lobes of the brain.  Prior to the development of effective drugs, it was thought to be a revolutionary treatment for serious mental diseases. It soon became abused and inadequately regulated, marking an end to one of the greatest controversies in psychiatric history .

Dr. Walter Freeman, the most notorious lobotomy supporter, carried out thousands of surgeries around the United States, occasionally in improvised “lobotomobiles.” Numerous patients suffered from severe side effects, such as personality changes, cognitive impairment, and even death.  Lobotomies came to represent the overreach of psychiatry and the perils of using intrusive medical techniques without strong scientific support.

Photo by Behrooz on Unsplash

Consent and Unethical Experimentation

Although informed consent is fundamental to ethical medicine, psychiatric care has not always adhered to this ideal.  Many unethical experiments were carried out on psychiatric patients in the middle of the 20th century, frequently without the patients’ knowledge or consent.

The CIA’s MK-Ultra project, which involved mind control experiments with LSD and other chemicals, is among the most well-known examples of controversies in psychiatric history.  Numerous participants were mental health patients who were never informed of the medications they were administered or the reason behind them.  These practices, which were concealed for many years, damaged people and damaged public confidence in mental health providers.

In a similar vein, psychological experiments on minority groups have frequently been conducted without their informed consent.  Some communities have a long-standing fear of mental health facilities as a result of these occurrences.

Takeaways: What We Can Do Moving Forward

Even if it hurts to go back and relive these dark chapters, they have a purpose.  They serve as a reminder of the importance of openness, moral supervision, and patient rights.  There have been substantial changes to psychiatry since the second part of the 20th century. 

The deinstitutionalization movement, the emergence of patient advocacy movements, and the implementation of informed consent procedures have all contributed to the change in emphasis toward more efficient and compassionate treatment.

But how society perceives mental illness is still shaped by the past.  The contentious past of psychiatry has contributed to the stigma, anxiety, and false information that persist today.  Professionals and patients can collaborate to create a system that prioritizes healing, understanding, and dignity by candidly and openly facing this history. Interested in reading a book that depicts the horrors of Insane asylums? Purchase Asylum Scandals: Abuse, Torture, Corruption and Murder in Minnesota’s State Hospitals today!